Sunday, July 14, 2013

Argumentative essay for Professional and ethical issues in forensic psychology

The course paper is essentially an argumentative essay.The ethical dilemma of playing both a therapeutic and a forensic role has been debated in the literature for many years. Some authorities argue there is always a conflict of interest in such dual relationships, while other authorities argue the two roles can be reconciled and impartiality can be maintained. Locate at least 10 articles that discuss the therapeutic and the forensic roles, and take a stance on this particular debate. Make sure your collection of articles is balanced with regard to the roles and the viewpoints. Utilize the ethical decision-making process to create an argumentative paper supporting your stand. In other words, in a reasoned fashion, develop an argument for whether or not the two roles—therapeutic and forensic—can ethically coincide..Using multiple sources, defend your thesis of how/why therapeutic and forensic roles can or cannot be reconciled.
Ensure you argue for a particular side of the issue (no arguing both sides) and that your argument is well-supported by the scholarly literature, professional ethical guidelines, and/or the law.
Include solid reasoning and a compelling thesis.
Remember, a strong argument always supports its ideas and proves the other side wrong. Make sure to both support your views with credible arguments and sources, and to also refute the other side.

No comments:

Post a Comment