Tuesday, August 6, 2013

critical thinking

Each part must have 300 words

Part one


Description



Consider this scenario: For many students, teacher evaluations are a moment of retaliation. Those who received grades they feel are unwarranted will often blame the teacher's poor instruction or grading methods for their failure. One student, Joshua, defends the teaching style of Dr. Deming. "I thought Dr. Deming was fantastic. He was always engaging and willing to take some extra time when I needed it," he explains. Tara, who received a D- on her final paper, disagrees; "If he is such a great professor, then why did I do so poorly this semester? I worked so hard! If it's not his fault, I don't know who to blame. Joshua, you can't possibly make me believe that Dr. Deming knows what he's talking about." A third student, Jenna, joins the conversation, having received a grade she likely deserved; "I don't think Dr. Deming was a bad professor. He gave me a C, but honestly I didn't expect much better than that. Anyway, forget Dr. Deming—I can't believe that girl tripped in the hallway in front of everyone!"
Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Based on the scenario, determine whether Dr. Deming deserves favorable evaluations. Respond to the following questions in your initial post:

What premises might logically support this claim? Are there any patterns you can discern from the different students' responses to Dr. Deming's teaching? If so, explain.
What premises might be psychologically relevant but not logically relevant? 
What is wrong with stating premises that are only psychologically relevant to their conclusion? By what criteria are you able to determine fallacy forms within this scenario?

Part two

Consider this case study: After graduating from college with a degree in science, Andy finds a solid job in his profession, gets married, and has two sons. Twelve years later, he moves to another company promising him steady advancement within its managerial ranks. A devoted family man, Andy admires his wife's dedication to raising their boys. But he also observes that his sons, approaching their teen years, benefit greatly from his fatherly friendship and counsel—especially as they approach what he and his wife realize could prove to be a difficult transitional period in their upbringing. So, he has made a commitment to spend plenty of time with them, playing baseball and helping with their schoolwork. But he also loves his work, and does well at it. It has become apparent that to advance rapidly up the managerial ranks, he needs an MBA. A nearby university offers the degree in an evening-and-weekend program that would allow him to continue fulltime employment but would soak up his free time for the next several years and throw most of the family activities into his wife's hands.

Assume of Andy’s perspective within this scenario. In keeping with Andy's point of view, address the following:

Define the concept of reasonableness.
Where should Andy focus his attention? Why? 
Why do you believe someone like Andy is capable of incorporating nonrational mental processes into his critical thought? How are we able to engage in this intense level of cognition?
In your view, what rational and emotional principles are at work?

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Critical thinking


Consider this scenario:For two weeks, Jeff and Dana have gone back and forth over what movie to see Friday after work. Jeff wants to go see a foreign picture, claiming it will broaden both of their cultural horizons. "I was a film major," he says, "what more authority do you need?" Of course, Dana can't argue with the fact that Jeff excelled in his film courses, "but that hardly makes you an expert. In fact, you're so stubborn it feels like I'm talking to a wall. I want to see something romantic, something to remind you of how I should be treated once in a while!" Dana's suggestion falls on deaf ears. "I swear, when it comes to romance movies, if you see one you've seen them all," Jeff says. "It's like running circles around the same old track. I could write the script for you and save us each the ten dollars."

Why does each kind of argument create an inferential claim? For example, why would Jeff's expert testimony weigh more heavily than Dana's when it comes to film choices?
Are we ever 100% certain about causal inferences?
Why do analogies work in some arguments but not in others?
Of the several analogies presented in the scenario, which do you believe was the most successful? Why?
Present an example of a commonly used argument form.

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Describe an area of expertise or a skill you have that u would be willing to share with the XX community


6 questions to answer expected answers can be found on the website information so mainly paraphrasing + 
1) Pls describe how you feel d mission of XX complements your families values/ beliefs
2) Which SLRs connect well with your hopes and dreams for school for your child
3) What do you feel your child will contribute to the XX community
4) What are your expectations for your child at XX
5) Describe an area of expertise or a skill you have that u would be willing to share with the XX community
6) Comments about Special interests, hobbies, personality, etc.

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Assess Organizational Ethics:


Assigned Text

Book
Johannesen, R. L., Valde, K. S., & Whedbee, K. E.  (2008).  Ethics in human communication.  Long Grove, IL:  Waveland Press.  ISBN: 9781577665557  
Book
Johnson, C. E.  (2012).  Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow.  (4th ed.).  Los Angeles, CA:  SAGE.  ISBN: 9781412982221  


Activity 1:    Ethical standards  
Required Reading:
Johannesen, R. L., Valde, K. S., & Whedbee, K. E. (2008). Chapters 1, 2, 3

Johnson, C. E. (2009). Chapter 5

Assess Organizational Ethics:
Identify an organization and describe the standards of ethics and integrity within it. Explain how you arrived at these conclusions and determined the organization's standards of ethics. 

Length: 6 pages 
Additional Information:  
•Please make the assigned text a part of the bibliography.
•Where appropriate and possible, please include the page numbers in the bibliography.
•Please do not use Wikipedia as your source of information.
•The text cited in the bibliography should not be older than 5 years.

The paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. 

Desired Style:  APA (6th edition)
Paper Length:  6 pages
Spacing:  Double Spaced
Deadline:  3 days
Language:  English

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Discuss what they are and some common techniques used to try and subvert their security.

Part 1 of 2
Please Read the following articles on Cloud Security and their Associated Risks:
·         Christodorescu, M., Sailer, R., Schales, D. L., Sgandurra, D., & Zamboni, D. (2009, November). Cloud security is not (just) virtualization security: a short paper. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM workshop on Cloud computing security(pp. 97-102). ACM.
·         Fogarty, K. (2012, August 10). The biggest cloud computing security risk is impossible to eliminate. Retrieved from http://www.networkcomputing.com/security/the-biggest-cloud-computing-security-ris/240005337
·         Kinsella, J. (2012, September 26). 5 (more) key cloud security issues. Retrieved from http://www.csoonline.com/article/717307/5-more-key-cloud-security-issues
- Discuss with your classmates why Cloud Security is different from that of traditional network architectures and what you think the future holds for Cloud Security and it's adoption rate with company's.  What are some technologies and solutions that can be used to reduce risk for the "Cloud" or "Cloud Data" .

Your answer should include the terms, concepts, and theories learned thus far. Cite each source used. No credit will be given if Wikipedia is used. Your answer should be a minimum of  250 words. To post, click on the Topic title (e.g., Week 7 Forum to access the topic and then click the "Post New Thread" button.

Part 2 of 2
(1)Research VPNs

(2)Discuss what they are and some common techniques used to try and subvert their security.


Your answer should include the terms, concepts, and theories learned thus far. Cite each source used. No credit will be given if Wikipedia is used. Your answer should be a minimum of  250 words. To post, click on the Topic title (e.g., Week 7 Forum to access the topic and then click the "Post New Thread" button.



Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Learning Style


1)What is YOUR preferred learning style?
Were you able to use your learning style when you were a student in the preK -12 setting? Why or why not?
Do you think it will be important for you to assess your students' preferred learning styles? Why or why not?

2)How do you assess your students' learning?
Why do you assess your students' learning that way?
Does this style of assessment reflect your beliefs / understanding about student learning? Explain your statement.
How would you "ideally" like to assess your students' learning?
What obstacles prevent you from this "ideal"?
How can you remove or minimize those obstacles?

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!

Authentic Assessment


Prepare a 3 page research-based and professional practice-based rationale that supports the use of authentic types of assessments.  (By "professional practice" we mean the literature written by educators who describe how and why they use authentic assessment methods).
Please examine multiple strategies of authentic assessment, including student-centered and teacher-centered scenarios, as well as self-assessment, surveys, and portfolios.

This rationale is to clearly address each of the following:
1.  What is "authentic assessment"?
2.  What is a specific example of an authentic assessment that you would (or do) use in your (current or future) classroom?
3.  How is authentic assessment different from traditional assessment measures?
4.  What are the benefits / advantages of authentic assessments over traditional assessment measures?

Assignment Expectations
Your research and professionally-based rationale is to clearly illustrate your understanding of authentic assessments - as depicted in the background information reading.
Use a number of resources from the research and professional literature to support your claims. In particular:
You are to use a minimum of 2 articles / resources from the literature (These may include the readings provided for you on the background information page).
You are to appropriately cite and list your supporting references.

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!