Sunday, July 14, 2013

Behavioral Analysis / Verbal Behavior


:
develop a 1 page reaction paper specific a selected peer reviewed article of their own choosing relevant to Applied Behavioral Analysis and or Applied Verbal Behavior.
C. Course Description
This course, presented by Robert Schramm, BCBA is designed for providers to learn specific research based strategies specific to Autism, Applied Behavioral Analysis and Verbal Behavior Approaches. Individual participants will gain information on how to incorporate the above mentioned philosophies into classroom and therapy sessions. This course will provide hands on practice and techniques to better understand behavior and the use positive reinforcement to increase targeted behaviors and decrease problematic behaviors. Additional strategies and techniques specific to increasing speech and language skills will be discussed and practiced. Participants of the course will be choose 2 articles related to ABA and AVB strategies and techniques to further study the use of ABA specific to children with Autism and other behavioral challenges.

Socially Responsible Ethics and Business


Write from an overall view describing the broad aspect of Socially Responsible Ethics and Business. Be sure to cover course objectives #s 1 – 8 (written below) in your paper.
1. Examine and evaluate current literature on corporate social responsibility.
2. Compare and contrast the theories, models, principles, and practices of corporate social responsibility.
3. Analyze the role of governmental and quasi-governmental regulatory institutions in establishing and maintaining corporate socially responsible standards, policies, and practices.
4. Explore teamwork and diversity issues, within the context of corporate social responsibility.
5. Analyze the risks of corporate social responsibility.
6. Compare and contrast the global views and practices of corporate social responsibility.
7. Analyze, compare, and contrast the role of leadership in establishing and sustaining corporate socially responsible policies, and practices, within the contexts of organizations, industries, nations and the global community.
8. Analyze and apply socially responsible corporate practices to contemporary business problems.
Socially Responsible Ethics and Business
Socially Responsible Ethics and Business
I. What are business ethics?
A. What does the law say about business ethics?
II.What is corporate social responsibility?
III.Why should a business act ethically?
A. Government needs businesses to help with the social and economic issues.
B. Ethical companies gain the trust of stakeholders.
C. Ethical companies gain a competitive advantage.
D. Ethical companies earn a stronger position in the stock market.
IV.What are the effects of acting ethically?
A. Financial costs include equipment and labor.
B. Non-financial costs include impacts on the environment.

Nonverbal behaviour



an opportunity to see nonverbal behavior in action.
Many communication scholars argue that nonverbal behavior employed by various cultures is rule- governed. Unfortunately, we don’t know what the rules are until we violate them. For this assignment, choose one of the dimensions addressed in the book: appearance, kinesics, eye contact, haptics, paralanguage, or proxemics and design a nonverbal violation. Note: This is not a license to commit an illegal and/or harassing/abusive act. All students WILL be held accountable to the university’s code of student conduct. Try to avoid obvious violations, such as sustained eye contact or intrusion of space in an elevator. Once you have developed the idea, implement it and observe the reaction you receive. In an analysis paper ranging between two and three typed, double-spaced pages, address the following:
1. What violation did you employ? Describe the situation in full. What did you do, when, where, and how? What reaction (positive and/or negative) did you receive? Use scholarly journal article to research expectancy violation theory and explain why you think you received this particular reaction.
2. In a second paragraph, analyze the rule you violated. Do you believe this to be a significant rule?
Why? What does the rule say about our culture?
3. In a final paragraph, address how this rule is complemented by other societal norms.

Social problems in society Choose only one and expound it, prostitution, poverty and corruption

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!

Race, the House we live in film analytical paper


We will be screening two movies in class. For each movie screened students will submit using
e-learning a “film analytical short paper” which will consist of a few paragraphs analyzing the
feature films or documentaries used in class.
Guidelines to write analytical papers:
In writing analytical papers, you should be able to build a coherent and consistent argument
about a controversy or main points discussed in the film or documentary. Students are encourage
to use the readings and/or ideas from our class discussions and offer, if necessary, relevant
quotes to support their assertions. It should follow a logical progression of ideas expanding
on the main point. The argument should be supported by an adequate number of concrete facts and
details with citations when appropriate. Your points should be developed well enough to be
convincing.
In general, the more focused the argument the better it is. The stronger thesis allows you to
explore key assumptions and their consequences. The weaker thesis tends to generate a simple
summary of the readings.CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
Weeks Topic Reading Assignment
Week 1 Introduction
General overview of Inequality Reader:
(TH) **David and Moore
(TH) **Krueger
Week 2 Key concepts: class, status, income, power elite
(T) **E.O Wright
(T) **Chan and Goldthorpe
(T) **Richer
(TH) **Wright Mills
(TH) **Domhoff
(TH) **Brooks
Week 3 Poverty and the underclass (T)**Ehrenreich
(T) **Smeeding
(T) ** Massey and Denton
(TH) **Hays
(TH) **DeLuca and Rosenbaum
Week 4 Fist Analytical Paper Film
Week 5 Racialization and immigration (T) **Omi &Winant
(T) **Farley
(TH) **Portes and Zhou
(TH) **Waters
Week 6 Discrimination and Prejudice (T) **Bertrand &Mullainathan
(T) **Feagin
(T) **Steele
(TH) **Wilson
(TH) **Oliver and Shapiro
(TH) **Bobo
Week 7 Gender inequality (T)**Lober
(T) **Belkin
(T) **Stone
(TH) **Correll, Benard, Paik
(TH) **Reskin
(TH) **Jacobs
All of the readings are from The Inequality Reader: Contemporary and foundational readings in
race, class and gender, Author: David B. Grusky&SzonhaSzelenyi, Publisher: Westview press,
Edition: 2nd edition, Year Published: 2011

Approach to social housing



An EXPLORATORY PROJECT will require you to propose a housing form for a particular urban site,
exemplifying and promoting the personal stance you have developed in relation to debates about  community, the role of the state, and the ethical responsibility of architects. In your final
submission, you will not be permitted to present your ideas orally – the aim will be to  communicate and advance your ‘approach to social housing’ entirely through posters covering no
more than the area of a single A0 sheet of paper (not even a physical model will be allowed).
The argument for your proposals is to be advanced and justified within an accompanying
illustrated essay.CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
Your ESSAY will outline the development of your personal views about social housing – traced
through built and projected schemes you have considered, favourite writings and relevant
theory, together with contextual analysis and critically evaluated personal beliefs and values.
It is recommended that your Essay should contain the following ingredients:
a) an introductory outline of questions explored in the readings / seminars, such as
? what do different people understand by the term ‘social housing’?
? how has social housing evolved into its current form?
? what are the main issues related to social housing today?
? what ideas about the nature of social housing offer the most hope for the future?
? what role might architects perform in order to improve social housing?
? (seminars may not address all the above, but may focus upon other issues instead)
b) identification of your own thinking about the design of social housing
? how your ideas about, and attitudes towards, social housing have developed
through participation in the seminar series.
? how you would now respond to a competition entry or commission to design
housing for a particular community.
c) explanation and critical evaluation of your own EXPLORATORY PROJECT (see above)
? how your scheme addresses the issues you consider important.
? which aspects of your scheme are less successful in addressing important issues.
? what other issues are raised by your scheme.
(note that assessment will focus upon the quality of your evaluation
rather than the success/failure or other qualities of your scheme).
d) conclusions in terms of the ethically grounded process you would (ideally) follow if  invited to participate in a social housing design project at some time in the future
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!

Should sex education be increased in schools in an attempt to curb problems such as teenage pregnancy?


Researched Rhetorical Analysis
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages (1250-1750 words)
Points: 150 points for final draft This assignment invites students to compose a persuasive essay examining a narrowly defined,  academic, beneficial, and credible topic developed with the help of the invention tools  provided in the textbooks, in the class, by the instructor, and with research. To solidify  such an analysis, you will incorporate research to explain more fully, illustrate more vividly  and support more concretely the evaluation of another professional’s writing. This essay does  not ask you to provide your own subjective opinions on the issue being discussed; rather, this  assignment asks you to assert evaluative claims about the effectiveness of an argument based solely on the author’s use of rhetorical concepts and writing skills, which would be used as  criteria for such an evaluation.The successful essay will develop and defend a claim (thesis)  about the effectiveness of an author’s persuasive efforts, which attempt to intervene in a controversial subject—something about which there is substantive and rational disagreement.
? Specific Requirements: Adhering to and using the standards found on the “Rubric for  Writing Assessment” included here, elements of effective persuasive essays discussed this  quarter, and the textbook’s rhetorical concepts, the research paper should be five to seven  pages in length, not including a Title and References pages. Additionally, the essay should  incorporate quotations, summaries,and paraphrases using introductory phrasing and document  sources in the text according to APA TheEasy Way!At least five different sources must be used  with not more than two deriving from a non-Baker College Internet resource. Information gained  from reference sources, such as an encyclopedia, (e.g. Wikipedia.org) or a dictionary will not  count as a legitimate source. The essay is worth 200points total (150 for final draft, 50 for  research, drafting, peer review, etc.) CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
? Introductions: Catch the reader’s interest in the introduction by providing a short  anecdote relevant to the paper; a revealing problem your research unveiled; a difficult  question; a telling quotation; a misconception that needs correction; or an epigraph followed  by detailed explanation of its relevance or significance to the analysis.
? Conclusions: Make the essay’s conclusions helpful and memorable for the reader.
Remember to save something engaging or provocative for the end.CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
? Content: The essay will help you learn to construct an arguable claim, identify reasons  and evidence, which are both relevant and sufficient, and to consider and respond to other  writers’ positions. This essay should identify and discuss the author’s purpose, the intended  audience, a brief background or context of the topic, the author’s language and style in  service of a persuasive purpose, and how these elements contribute to the effectiveness of the  appeals. You will also consider the rhetorical appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos as the  means of making argumentsto produce an accurate assessment of the article’s argument. The  essay should also consider the articles’ underlying logic deployed to construct its argument.
Such an analysis will include an assessment of the general clarity of reasoning and, if  necessary, analysis of logical fallacies. It is important to note that although you may be  analyzing others’ views on a topic,you must develop your own argument as an outgrowth of this  analysis. More details about writing a rhetorical analysis on pages 270-271 of Writing: A  Guide for College and Beyond.CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
? Audience: Try to ignore any negative preconceptions about writing a research paper.
If the topic has been chosen with care and interest, this will focus one’s efforts and the  ethos will be persuasively communicated to the reader. Consider the audience to be classmates  or family but not necessarily your instructor. Although the essay will be academic in nature,  try to use a semi-formal tone. Please try not to be dry or boring as one might imagine an  “academic voice” might be. Work to make the paper interesting for the writer and for readers.
In other words, envision that the essay teaches the reader something while also attempting to  guide the reader toward accepting one’s judgment on the argument’s effectiveness.
? Rhetorical Strategies: Try to apply strategies learned this quarter. In addition to  using convincing reasons, does the essay stir a reader’s emotions? Is the train of thought  rigorous? Can you appeal to your readers’ morals or ethics? Does the essay show readers that  the writer—oneself as a researcher—is careful, responsible, and fair-minded with the  presentation of information? Does the essay accurately represent competing ideas and claims  fairly and accurately? Does the essay conform to conventions of written English in terms of  grammar, mechanics, usage, and formatting?CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!
? Sources: The more authoritative sources used, the more convincing the research is; the  fewer and less credible the sources used, the less persuasive the writing is. Choose sources  from a variety of sources like journals, magazine articles, books, newspapers, government  documents, and the Internet. Databases like ProQuest and Infotrac are good sources. Moreover,
sources should be relatively recent, within the last five years unless you need to present a  history of the topic as part of your argument. Employ the research to support your evaluation  of the author’s effectiveness. On the one hand, for example, a source might convincingly  disprove an assertion of the author under scrutiny. On the other hand, question and challenge  a source’s credibility by examining credentials, assumptions, affiliations, and implications,  which could be used in the paper’s discussion.