Write an essay with the following instructions:What are the limitations of current cancer chemotherapy and, therefore, what do we need to do better in order to have better drugs? What do you say to a patient who asks you why chemotherapy generally has unpleasant side effects and why aren't the scientists doing something about this? This essay could explore a number of areas. What are the examples of drugs that are far from ideal, and why is this. Are there more modern, better treatments that work well with minimal side effects? If so, why is this and can these properties be transferred to generate new drugs? Are combination therapies the way forward, or do these too have limitations? What roles do disease heterogeneity and “personalized medicine” play? What is the interplay with other treatments including surgery and radiation therapy? There are many other areas that you can think of.It may be easiest to answer this in general terms, but this must be illustrated with clear examples including structures. Alternatively you could look at specific molecular targets.
Write a research paper focusing on the nutrition and health practices/issues in the saudi arabian culture using at least five sources.
Literary report on Gatsby in The Great Gatsby. Literary criticism for outside research needs 4 sources minimum, needs to have opinion on novel as well as literary critics opinion
This week, you learned about observational writing and you will use the strategies discussed in the text-book to help you discover a topic (a particular relationship) and observe/explore that relationship in depth.Write a rough draft that examines a particular relationship and its significance; explain the nature of the relationship in writing. Refer to page 74 of your textbook to help you identify a relationship and shape your essay.You should include 3-5 outside resources in your assignment.Assignment should be 2-3 pages in length.For citation guidelines, please refer to the table in the APA Style section of the syllabus.
In this individual work assignment, you will have an opportunity to assess your experiences and how they relate to victimization.Using a word processing program, write an answer to the following question:•Considering what you learned in this chapter about crime victimization, what measures can you take to better protect yourself from crime? Your assignment should be 1-2 pages in length.For citation guidelines, please refer to the table in the APA Style section of the syllabus.Protection from Street Crime Do not walk alone on dark, deserted streets. Keep your wallet or purse where pickpockets can’t reach it. Never carry a large sum of money. [ Hold your purse firmly, and do not leave it unattended on a counter or in a grocery cart. Or consider putting money in your pocket so it won’t be as easy to grab as purse straps. If someone grabs your purse, do not put yourself at risk by resisting. If you are going out alone at night, let a friend or family member know your plans. When out alone, keep a whistle handy and hold your keys in your hand while walking. Lock your car door, whether you are inside the car or not. Avoid waiting at deserted bus stops. Walk to the next bus stop where others may be waiting. Also, consider taking a taxi and asking the driver to wait until you are inside your destination. If you are riding the bus, be aware of anyone who might be staring at you. You can prevent trouble by anticipating it and asking the driver for help. When planning to be away from home, never hide a door key under the doormat, behind the shutter or in a mailbox. These are familiar places to a burglar. A neighbor or family member can keep an extra key for you. When at home, keep your shades pulled at night and while you are undressing. Be cautious as to who knows you are alone. To avoid unwanted telephone calls, do not list your first name or address in the phone book or on your mailbox. Protecting Yourself from Crime and Abuse Don’t pay your bills by leaving your payments in a flagged mailbox. If you try to resist while being victimized, you may be injured. Other options are: sit down so you are not knocked down, make noise, whistle or call for help. In any case, tell the police as soon as possible.
A1: Net Cash FlowNo figures provided in line 30(net annual cash flow). Annual depreciation is incorrect at $832,500A2: Net Present ValueNPV calculation of 447,056 is incorrect. Revision needed for:Years 1 through 8PV factor and present value calculation for working capital returnBuilding restoration costs-whether should be treated as cash inflow or outflowTotal-formula needs revisionInvestment-146,276 is correctNet Present Value is incorrectA3: Stated IRR at 9,000 is incorrect. Revision needed for all cash flows.Provide final answer rounded to nearest thousandth of a percentA4: Accounting rate of return11.69% is not correct ARRA5: Payback PeriodPayback period calculation of 0 years and 0 months is incorrect. Investment amount not correct at 220,000. All cash flows need revision.B1: Net Cash Flow Without Depreciation$393,750 is not correct net cash flow for year 2 without depreciation.B1a: Impact of DepreciationDiscussion regarding depreciation tax shield is correct.Entrepreneur direct cash flow with depreciation for second year was 66,250 but no depreciation expense net cash flow rose to 393,750B2a: Appropriate ActionUpdate stated NPV of project upon recalculation in part A2B3a: Appropriate ActionUpdate stated IRR upon recalculation in A3B5: Payback PeriodDiscuss advantages of the payback period method against other methods
Three important sub-disciplines of philosophy are addressed in this course: ethics, epistemology, and religion. For this paper, you will develop an argument that includes your own view on one specific topic relating to one of these sub-disciplines. Below is a list of topics from which you must choose. Feel free to combine topics that seem to fit with one another. It is recommended that you choose a topic that interests you or that you have thought about previously.In philosophical papers, it is always best to present both sides of the issue (remember that there are usually more than two sides to any issue), and then to present the side that you find the most convincing. Remember to back up your position with logical reasoning and factual evidence. In addition, be sure to utilize the philosophical content and ideas that you have encountered in this course.1.Identify the issue that you are going to examine. 2.Within that issue, clearly define the specific problem that will be the focus of the paper. 3.Present multiple sides of the problem and state your position on the issue.4.Create an argument that supports the side of the problem you take in the paper. As part of your argument, be sure to critique the weaknesses of opposing positions. 5.Utilize the philosophical theories and ideas that you have encountered in this course as much as possible. It is best to utilize primary philosophical texts as resources. Include at least five academic sources in this paper, at least three of which must come from the Ashford University Library. Any other resources should come from academic sources such as Project Gutenberg, classicallibrary.org, or other websites that include peer-reviewed articles and books. Select a topic from the following sub-disciplines:1.Ethics a.What is the best ethical system? b.Is it necessary to have universal ethical principles? c.What are the fundamental principles of ethics? d.What is the good life and how does one achieve it? e.Is ethics natural or learned behavior? f.What is an ethically bad life? How do we know? g.How do humans differentiate between good and bad in the realm of ethics? h.Do ethical actions have value apart from the outcomes of those actions? i.Are humans free or determined, and how does this perspective relate to human responsibility?
2.Epistemology a.What can humans know for certain and how can they justify that they actually know what they think they know? b.What are the limits of human perception and cognition? c.What is the relationship between scientific knowledge and other types of knowledge? d.What are the limits of skepticism? e.What are the differences between the mind and the brain? f.What is the best epistemological argument and explanation of how humans perceive their worlds? g.How did human consciousness emerge and where is it headed?3.Religion a.Is proof for the existence of God necessary? b.Which argument for the existence of God is strongest? Why? c.Can one be moral and not believe in God? d.Are science and religion in conflict? e.Can God’s omniscience and human free will be reconciled? f.Is there a rational argument for atheism? The paper must be at least six pages in length, formatted according to APA style, and include a title and a reference page (which does not count towards the page length). Support your point with examples from the text and at least five sources, three of which must be found in the Ashford University Library. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.Writing the Final Argumentative PaperThe Final Paper:1.Must be at least six pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 2.Must include a title page with the following: a.Title of paper b.Student’s name c.Course name and number d.Instructor’s name e.Date submitted 3.Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. 4.Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. 5.Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. 6.Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a minimum of three from the Ashford University Library. 7.Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 8.Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
