Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Ethical decision-making process


Paper instructions:
This Discussion Board Assignment is based on your reading of Case 10: Phantom Expenses on p. 631-632 of the Carroll/Buchholtz text. Determine how Jane Adams should handle this situation. Use the ethical decision-making process to reach a resolution. (Refer to the “Ethical Decision Making Diagram” on p. 253 of your text, Figure 8-8.) Your ethics screen should include an analysis of at least 5 ethical principles and tests found in the “Ethical Decision Making Diagram.”
Deliverables: What you will be typing in your initial Discussion Board Post is the action you are recommending Jane Adams take in this situation and an analysis of how each of the 5 ethical principles or tests guided you to the recommended action. Additionally, provide thoughtful feedback on the post of at least one other student. Simply stating “I disagree/agree with you” will not earn points.
Please note the functionality of this Bb forum.: You will be able to review and provide feedback on the threads of others AFTER you have posted your thread with answers to the assigned questions.
*Writing style for discussion board:
1. Write in complete sentence and paragraph format.
2. Postings must be free from grammar and spelling errors. To eliminate errors, consider drafting your post in a word processing program (i.e. Microsoft Word) before posting in Blackboard.
3. In the business environment, managers and colleagues need you to be clear and concise in your communication. The same applies on discussion board.
•Initial post: The length of your initial post will vary based on the question posed, ranging anywhere from 1 to several paragraphs. Again, be concise. Write as much as needed to effectively answer the question(s).
•Response: The feedback on a fellow student’s post should be equally clear and concise, ranging from 3 to 5 sentences.

Chinese Politics

paper instructions:

 2. Discuss the political implications of the relationship between the land and its people and how the physical and climate conditions influenced “the making of the despotic state†and “the collectivistic political culture†in China.

CLICK HERE TO GET MORE ON THIS PAPER.....

Ethical decision-making process


Paper instructions:
This Discussion Board Assignment is based on your reading of Case 10: Phantom Expenses on p. 631-632 of the Carroll/Buchholtz text. Determine how Jane Adams should handle this situation. Use the ethical decision-making process to reach a resolution. (Refer to the “Ethical Decision Making Diagram” on p. 253 of your text, Figure 8-8.) Your ethics screen should include an analysis of at least 5 ethical principles and tests found in the “Ethical Decision Making Diagram.”
Deliverables: What you will be typing in your initial Discussion Board Post is the action you are recommending Jane Adams take in this situation and an analysis of how each of the 5 ethical principles or tests guided you to the recommended action. Additionally, provide thoughtful feedback on the post of at least one other student. Simply stating “I disagree/agree with you” will not earn points.
Please note the functionality of this Bb forum.: You will be able to review and provide feedback on the threads of others AFTER you have posted your thread with answers to the assigned questions.
*Writing style for discussion board:
1. Write in complete sentence and paragraph format.
2. Postings must be free from grammar and spelling errors. To eliminate errors, consider drafting your post in a word processing program (i.e. Microsoft Word) before posting in Blackboard.
3. In the business environment, managers and colleagues need you to be clear and concise in your communication. The same applies on discussion board.
•Initial post: The length of your initial post will vary based on the question posed, ranging anywhere from 1 to several paragraphs. Again, be concise. Write as much as needed to effectively answer the question(s).
•Response: The feedback on a fellow student’s post should be equally clear and concise, ranging from 3 to 5 sentences.

Poetry


Paper instructions:
Write an essay of 750-1000 words on the poem “Forgiving my Father” from the uploaded materials.
Remember that you need to make a claim or claims about an issue you define.
Try not to go with the most obvious thing about the text–a genuine issue has more than one possible perspective.
Try to be clear without losing complexity.
Use In-text citations and have a Works Cited page.
Don’t forget to title the essay. A title needs to suggest what the essay is about. It
cannot be the title of the work you are writing about; it is unique to your essay.

Accommodations & Assessment Modification Critiqu


Paper instructions:
Using the list of accommodations from the report that is due at the beginning of the course and an actual unit exam, mid-term exam, or final exam, write a two-part critique on the accommodations and assessment modifications that need to be made for ELLs. Use the following guidelines to complete this LASA:
Part I: Accommodations—Using the list of accommodations from the report assignment, write a critique about each accommodation. The critique should include the following: (a) an explanation of the accommodation, (b) rationale for the accommodation, (c) any research that supports the accommodation, and (d) practical effectiveness of the accommodation. For example, most states require that ELLs are given additional time on examinations. Your critique would include the amount of time given to mainstream students in comparison to the extended time, why additional time is needed, research that supports extended time or “wait time,†and your opinion about its effectiveness or practicality in an instructions setting given the many restraints faced during testing time.
Part II: Assessment Modification—Using a chapter, unit, midterm, or final exam, write a critique that shows the appropriate modifications for ELLs at all levels (beginner, intermediate, and advanced). Modifications must be made to the (a) instructions, (b) actual test items, and (c) the scoring guide/rubric. This part of the critique should also list the accommodations discussed in part one and why you selected those particular accommodations. Format and page length for part two of the critique will vary. Be sure to attach the original exam/test as an appendix of the paper.

Taking on the Trust by steve weinberg

  Paper instructions:     

the book is TAKING IN THE TRUST BY STEVE WEINBERG      1) Summarize the main points or arguments of the author.      2) Analyze these points using your own persuasive skills.      3) Explain how the book can help us better understand US history

CLICK HERE TO GET MORE ON THIS PAPER.....

“window” into the U.S. in the second half o the 20th Century


Paper instructions:
short essay answer following questions
The readings from Mollie’s Job so far provide a “window” into the U.S. in the second half o the 20th Century. Several issues come into view:
(1) The role of race relations in determining the life prospects of people like Mollie James;
(2) The situation of small businessmen with an immigrant background, such as Archie Sergy; the world they faced and how they responded;
(3) The wide open growth of the economy in those year, creating opportunities for both would-be businessmen like Archie and workers like Mollie;
(4) The role of unions in those years: both the “seamy” side as shown by some elements of the Teamsters, and the better side as shown by the AFL-CIO, the IUE and the Textile Workers Union;
(5) The recurring theme of business-style “corruption,” whether it be in small business (Archie and associates), big business (GE and Westinghouse), or unions (Teamsters Local 560 and 945).
Utilize these themes and the facts you learned from the book to analyze the U.S. in the second half of the 20th Century. What was right or wrong, good or bad, from the point of view of an industrial worker like Mollie in this time period? How could we assess the country at this time, and how does that compare with today?