This means, you need to read the paper with the
course material in mind, including:•discussions about the need to
differentiate between narrow notions of “health education” and broader
approaches to health promotion indicated in the Ottawa Charter as a
matter of understanding and engaging with specific social
contexts;•discussions about the value of engaging with the social
dimensions of health; and•discussions about the strengths and
limitations of individualistic versus social approaches to understanding
health, as well as the concept of social practice.Although there is an
infinite number of ways you might critically engage with a paper (e.g.
on the basis of its study design or methodological strengths and
limitations) we are asking you read the paper with regard to the course
material in weeks 1-4 and to write a critical summary that demonstrates
your understanding and thinking about this. It might help to imagine
your readers are colleagues involved in trying to design and develop
health promotion initiatives that are informed by and responsive to the
social aspects of health involved in the particular domain in which you
are working.Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
You are asked to do two things in the “critical” part of the
summary.1.Develop and establish a clear position on the strengths and/or
limitations of the paper. Given the word limit you are advised to
choose one main point you want to make about the paper and to develop
this point into your position. Make sure that you include a clear
statement about the position you are developing in writing your critical
summary, and then develop it through close analysis of your chosen
paper. Do not make a series (or list of points), we are asking you to
write an argument.2.Reflect on the implications of your position for
those involved in designing health promotion initiatives. Here you can
either discuss the implications for health promotion generally, or you
can narrow your focus down to a particular domain of health promotion.
It is not possible to pass this assignment if you simply write a summary of the paper (see marking criteria).
Remember, to critique something does not necessarily mean to find flaws
in it, engaging critically with a paper means reflecting on the papers
strengths and weaknesses.
Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment