JP Morgan Chase

Paper instructions:
Assignment 2: JPMorgan Chase Due Week 8 and worth 200 points
In the summer of 2012, JPMorgan Chase, the biggest U.S. bank, announced trading losses from investment decisions made by its Chief Investment Office (CIO) of $5.8 billion. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was provided falsified first quarter reports that concealed this massive loss.Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you: 1. Discuss how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy. 2. Determine the elements of a valid contract, and discuss how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship. 3. Compare and contrast the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions 4. Discuss the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty” and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action. 5. With the advent of mobile banking, discuss how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation. 6. Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: • Describe the legal environment of business, the sources of American law, and the basis of authority for government to regulate business. • Describe the elements of a contract and explain the basic provisions of contract law relative to offer, acceptance, capacity, legality, fraud, third-party rights, performance, and breach of contract. • Explain the components of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) relative to sales and lease contracts and the basic provisions of the UCC addressing sales / lease contracts, title, risk, insurable interests, and the performance and breach of contracts. • Use technology and information resources to research issues in business law. • Write clearly and concisely about business law using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 200 Assignment 2: JPMorgan Chase
Criteria
Unacceptable Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
Fair 70-79% C
Proficient 80-89% B
Exemplary 90-100% A
LEG 100 – Assignments and Rubrics
60-69% D
Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
1. Discuss how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely discussed how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high- risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.
Insufficiently discussed how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.
Partially discussed how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.
Satisfactorily discussed how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.
Thoroughly discussed how administrative agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) take action in order to be effective in preventing high-risk gambles in securities / banking, a foundation of the economy.Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
2. Determine the elements of a valid contract, and discuss how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship. Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely determined the elements of a valid contract, and did not submit or incompletely discussed how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship.
Insufficiently determined the elements of a valid contract, and insufficiently discussed how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship.
Partially determined the elements of a valid contract, and partially discussed how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship.
Satisfactorily determined the elements of a valid contract, and satisfactorily discussed how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship.
Thoroughly determined the elements of a valid contract, and thoroughly discussed how consumers and banks each have a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the banking relationship.
3. Compare and contrast the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions.
Insufficiently compared and contrasted the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions.
Partially compared and contrasted the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions.
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions.
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the differences between intentional and negligent tort actions.
4. Discuss the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty” and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty”Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!
Insufficiently discussed the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty”
Partially discussed the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty”
Satisfactorily discussed the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty”
Thoroughly discussed the tort action of “Interference with Contractual Relations and Participating in a Breach of Fiduciary duty”
LEG 100 – Assignments and Rubrics
to prevail in such a tort action. Weight: 15%
and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action.
and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action.
and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action.
and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action.
and, if the bank you’ve chosen were to behave as JP Morgan did, would you be able to prevail in such a tort action.
5. With the advent of mobile banking, discuss how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely discussed how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation.
Insufficiently discussed how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation.
Partially discussed how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation.
Satisfactorily discussed how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation.
Thoroughly discussed how banks have protected the software that allows for online transaction to occur through automation.

Click Here To Get More On This Paper!!!!