Friday, June 28, 2013

f8


Answer the following questions with a thorough discussion of the legal issue(s) presented, the rule(s) that applies(y), and the reasons for your conclusion(s). If there are facts that bear on your conclusion that are not available in the facts presented, assume all possible variations and trace the consequences of each assumption. Use the IRAC analysis. I have uploaded a sample file named “sample” that has the IRAC analysis structure. Be sure to analyze the Fact Set it will help with answering the questions.

  1. Can      Bill, as Walt’s partner, be indicted with Walt for violations of the CFAA      and ECPA? Why or why not?

  1. Who      has to pay the $7,400,000 the judge awarded Mesoco for trade secret      infringement?CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!

No comments:

Post a Comment