1. Do such “campaigns” impede the goals of community policing?
2. Do the goals of community policing and “zero-tolerance policing” work against one another?
3. Are these worthy goals for law enforcement or are they merely public relations gimmicks that make the public think that something new and unique is being done?
4. Does such questioning as in the Dearborn case constitute racial profiling?
5. What does United States v. Martinez-Fuertesuggest about the propriety of racial profiling in law enforcement?
? Does the case justify activities like those in Dearborn?
2. Do the goals of community policing and “zero-tolerance policing” work against one another?
3. Are these worthy goals for law enforcement or are they merely public relations gimmicks that make the public think that something new and unique is being done?
4. Does such questioning as in the Dearborn case constitute racial profiling?
5. What does United States v. Martinez-Fuertesuggest about the propriety of racial profiling in law enforcement?
? Does the case justify activities like those in Dearborn?
No comments:
Post a Comment