For your
second paper you are to consider a particular case, namely, that of
direct-to-consumer drug advertising. The details of the case are set
forth on pp 319-320 of your text. You are to decide if
direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs is ethical. Does
the advertising lead to self-diagnosis or take advantage of someone's
hope for a cure? If you decide that the direct-to-consumer advertising
of pharmaceuticals is ethical, why is the U.S. and New Zealand the only
two developed countries that allow it?
Whether you decide the
advertising is ethical or unethical, argue your case from a
deontological point of view. That means that you may use and apply
Kant's categorical imperative, or Rawl's principles of justice.
Remember, a deontological approach mandates that one's duty is to do
what is morally right and to avoid what is morally wrong, regardless of
the consequences.
Click here to get more on this essay.....
In arguing your case, assume that you are
writing for a general audience, and write in such a way as to try to
convince your readers that you are correct in your moral judgment. To
do this you will have to present and develop your arguments along one or
more of the deontological approaches. After presenting your initial
argument, consider at least one argument on the other side. This
antithetical argument may be either deontological or utilitarian in
nature. Then answer that alternative argument.
Your paper should
come to a definite conclusion concerning the case.In summary: (1) choose
which deontological method you will use and indicate that method; (2)
use that method, developing the argument in support of your case; (3)
present and answer an argument on the other side; and (4) draw the
conclusion to which your argument leads you.
Click here to get more on this essay.....
Let Us help you order now!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment