Description:
2. Could this strike have been pre-empted? What factors, if changed, may have pre-empted the disaster?3. Is there any indication that New York or Washington D.C. utilized a hazard and/or vulnerability analysis in their planning for this type of disaster? If yes, then elaborate. If no, then elaborate.
The terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, emphasizes the importance of not relying on history alone. There had never been such an attack by terrorists on civilians on American soil; consequently, preparation for such a major attack seemed pointless. Any historian would note that during World War II, there were some skirmishes off our coasts, and minor sabotage from “fifth columnists” was rapidly quelled. The Pearl Harbor military installation was attacked, and although tragic, it was seen as military-to-military confrontation best handled by our fighting forces.Click Here To Get More On This Paper.........
Times have changed; 9/11 happened. Other factors, such as political, environmental, and economic changes should be examined. Answer the following questions in your paper:
1. Within the framework of a hazard and vulnerability analysis, what were the pre-9/11 indicators that a possible disaster (terrorist attack) might occur?
2. Could this strike have been pre-empted? What factors, if changed, may have pre-empted the disaster?
3. Is there any indication that New York or Washington, D.C., utilized a hazard and/or vulnerability analysis in their planning for this type of disaster? Elaborate in your responses.
No comments:
Post a Comment